Dickson v. Darnell
Washington Supreme Court
. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Huneke, J., entered May 22, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, C. J.
Action for $1,046.50, with interest, claimed' tó be due under an oral contract pursuant to which plaintiff purchased for defendants certain horses for resale to the French Republic. Defendants counterclaimed, demanding a judgment against plaintiff for $1,303.65, with interest.
The main controversy, as we view it, relates to the terms of the contract. It is not controverted that the horses were *302to meet certain specifications, but plaintiff claims that there was no agreement as to who should determine whether in fact they did so or not, while defendants claim that it was agreed that the French…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Empson Packing Co. v. ClawsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Chapman v. Kansas City, Clinton & Springfield RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Brooke v. Laurens Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Nofsinger v. RingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Canton Lumber Co. v. LillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- LeDoux v. Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- Hegeberg v. New England Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Pacific Commercial Co. v. GreerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Field v. DescalziSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Hendricks v. DahlgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.