Legal Opinion

In re Straus

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 4, 1934No. 21323PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWTTZ, District Judge.

This is a motion to punish Sam Straus, also known as Samuel Straus, respondent herein, for contempt for having willfully and deliberately failed to comply with the turnover order made by one of the referees in bankruptcy, dated August 22, 1933.

The bankrupt is presumed to be in possession of the property and books which were directed to be turned over by the referee. Under the decisions, the presumption of continued possession must be explained in order that the respondent be relieved of complying with the order. This burden the respondent has failed to meet. In re…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Cooper v. DasherSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. In Re SieglerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. In re GoldsteinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
  5. In re ReissDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re McMordieDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API