Legal Opinion
Cutonilli v. State
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 14, 2017No. CIVIL NO. JKB-15-629PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
James K. Bredar, United States District Judge
On March 9, 2017, Plaintiff John Cuto-nilli (“Plaintiff’) filed a pro se Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Motion to Amend”). (ECF No. 19.) The State of Maryland filed a response brief objecting in part to Plaintiffs proposed amendments. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiff has not replied to the State’s response brief within the fourteen-day window allotted by Local. Rule 105.2(a) (D. Md. 2016).
The Court has carefully reviewed Plaintiffs proposed amendments and has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Stan Laber v. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Susie Myers Perkins, Administratrix of the Estate of John David Perkins, Jr., Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Stephen Kolbe v. Lawrence Hogan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- United Auto Workers, Local 5285 v. Gaston Festivals, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dangerfield v. Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Grim v. Baltimore Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
- Jones v. Eli Lilly and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Shakeri v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Taylor v. MGM Resorts International, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023