Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Utah Board of Pardons

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1994No. 930355PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiff Robert Dean Lancaster appeals the district court’s summary dismissal of his petition for extraordinary relief brought pursuant to rule 65B of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. Lancaster contends that the Utah Board of Pardons (“Board”) violated his due process rights when it rescinded his parole date. We affirm.

In June 1978, Lancaster pleaded guilty to criminal homicide, murder in the second degree, a first degree felony under section 76-5-203 of the Utah Code. He received an indeterminate sentence of five years to life in the Utah State Prison. In May 1979,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Labrum v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Fernandez v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Foote v. Utah Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gerrish v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Renn v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Padilla v. Utah Bd. of Pardons and ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Preece v. HouseUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Neel v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API