Legal Opinion

Neel v. Holden

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1994No. 930447PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

In this habeas corpus proceeding, plaintiff David Neel, an inmate at the Utah State Prison, contends that the Utah Board of Pardons (the “Board”) denied him due process of law and the effective assistance of counsel by (i) denying him access to confidential psychological reports that the Board used in deciding not to grant him parole, and (ii) refusing to permit his counsel to address the Board directly during his parole grant hearing. The district court denied Neel’s petition. We reverse and remand with instructions that another parole grant hearing be held in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Michigan v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Michigan v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Labrum v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Straley v. Utah Board of PardonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Padilla v. Utah Bd. of Pardons and ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. GordonUtah Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API