Neel v. Holden
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:
In this habeas corpus proceeding, plaintiff David Neel, an inmate at the Utah State Prison, contends that the Utah Board of Pardons (the “Board”) denied him due process of law and the effective assistance of counsel by (i) denying him access to confidential psychological reports that the Board used in deciding not to grant him parole, and (ii) refusing to permit his counsel to address the Board directly during his parole grant hearing. The district court denied Neel’s petition. We reverse and remand with instructions that another parole grant hearing be held in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michigan v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Michigan v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Labrum v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Monson v. CarverUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Straley v. Utah Board of PardonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Padilla v. Utah Bd. of Pardons and ParoleUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. GordonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.