Legal Opinion

Coffel v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided December 28, 2007No. 06-07-00149-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice MOSELEY.

Roy James Coffel appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI), second offense. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (Vernon 2003) (defining crime of DWI), § 49.09 (Vernon Supp.2007) (providing enhanced penalties for subsequent convictions). In a single issue, Coffel contends the trial court erred by admitting evidence about the technical violations he committed during his previous community supervision for DWI. For the reasons stated below, we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting such evidence.

An appellate court reviews…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Rankin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Stine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  2. Anthony Haynes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  3. Austin Douglas Worley v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2026
  4. Clint Harrison Eller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
  5. Clint Harrison Eller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API