Legal Opinion

Philips Electronics North America Corp. v. Contec Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided January 9, 2006No. Civ.A. 02-123-KAJPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JORDAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before me is a motion filed by plaintiffs Philips Electronics North America Corp. and U.S. Philips Corp. (collectively, “Philips”), seeking summary judgment on liability for contributory infringement and inducing infringement. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 524.) Also before me is a motion filed by defendants Remote Solution Co., Ltd., F/K/A Hango Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Remote Solution”), and Hango Remote Solution, Inc. (“Hango”; collectively, “Defendants”), seeking summary judgment of non-infringement and summary judgment for failure to prove…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API