Dyer v. Broadway Central Bank
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.
The complaint alleges that plaintiffs, members of the New York Stock Exchange, at defendant’s request and on the latter’s agreement to pay, purchased “ for and on account of the defendant ” certain specified stocks. The basis of the motion to dismiss the pleading for insufficiency is the claim that it appears on the face thereof that the order and the promise to pay were illegal and ultra vires. Assuming that the defendant did exceed its powers in the transaction referred to, the objection of ultra vires is, nevertheless, in my opinion, not available to it, because after the purchase of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Logan County National Bank v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jemison v. Citizens' Savings Bank of JeffersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Mullen v. J. J. Quinlan & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Thomas Gordon Malting Co. v. Bartels Brewing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Appleton v. Citizens' Central National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Arndt v. LeffAlbany City Court · 1958
- Block v. Pennsylvania Exchange BankNew York Supreme Court · 1929