Legal Opinion

Block v. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtCotillo, J.

The • action is by stockbrokers against a State bank for damages due to its failure to take up certain stock purchased by plaintiffs for principals for which the bank was acting as agent. The original complaint was held bad by the Appellate *154Division on the authority of Dyer v. Broadway Central Bank (130 Misc. 842), evidently because a bank could not legally engage in the purchase of common stocks. It was indicated in that opinion that while a National bank could not act as agent for another in the purchase of securities, the situation might be different with State banks “ when specially…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dyer v. Broadway Central BankNew York Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API