Commonwealth v. Baronas
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
Art. VIII, § 5, of the duly enacted by-laws of the town of Lunenburg provides that “No person under the influence of liquor shall be admitted to, or be per*322mitted to remain at a public dance. No person shall have any intoxicating liquor in his possession in any park, dance hall, or other public place in this town.” By art. X, whoever violates art. VIII shall, “in cases not otherwise provided for, forfeit and pay for each offense a fine not exceeding twenty dollars.” These by-laws were in force on July 15, 1933. On that day the defendant admittedly had intoxicating liquor in his possession at…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Commonwealth v. ParksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Commonwealth v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bloom v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- John Donnelly & Sons, Inc. v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Grace v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- City of Revere v. AucellaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.