Legal Opinion

Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1964No. Appeals, Nos. 29, 30, and 31PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

The order of the commission refusing the transfer of gas, electric and water facilities denies appellant, Drexelbrook Associates, rights to which it is clearly entitled under the existing law, and constitutes an abuse of discretion by the commission.

The record in this case shows there are many instances where landlords and owners of large apartments and office buildings purchase utility service on a wholesale basis and furnish such service to their office or apartment tenants. Appellant’s Exhibit No. 5 lists a large number of apartment houses and developments where single…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Relief Electric Light, Heat & Power Company's PetitionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Borough of Ambridge, Appel. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Overlook Development Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Killian v. Heintz Div. Kelsey HayesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API