Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Tarver

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1895No. 633PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

The suit was by E. R. Tarver, the receiver of the Laredo Improvement Company, to recover of B. M. Hammond, the Laredo Electric and Railway Company, G. Bedell Moore, E. S. Harris, C. F. Drake, and Charles F. Yeager, the amount of twelve notes and to foreclose a vendor’s lien. The notes had been executed by Hammond alone to B. F. Nicholson and Charles F. Yeager, who preceded Tarver as receiver of said company, as part of purchase for certain real estate deeded by them to Hammond, and the other defendants were sought to be held on these notes, on allegation that Hammond was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ellis v. Vernon Ice, Light, & Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Security Trust Co. v. Lipscomb CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Hammond v. AtleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Mudge v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Glenn v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Mississippi Mills v. BaumanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API