State v. Naudain
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
ARMSTRONG, P. J.,
Defendant was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of aggravated murder, stemming from a home-invasion robbery. On appeal, defendant raises multiple assignments of error. We write to address only defendant’s contention that the trial court erred when it instructed the jury on self-defense. Defendant argues that, because he had not raised a defense of self-defense, that instruction amounted to impermissible comments on the evidence by the trial judge. We agree. Our resolution of that contention obviates our need to address defendant’s remaining assignments of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. NaudainOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. BlasingameCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. NaudainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. SimonovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.