Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Stormont

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 13, 1933No. 14,589PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDudine, J.

Appellee filed suit against appellant to recover damages sustained by reason of improper handling of a shipment of four hundred cases of eggs from Oakland City and Petersburg, Indiana, to Jersey City, New Jersey. Trial was had by the court who made a special finding of facts favorable to appellee, stated one conclusion of law, that appellee was entitled to recover judgment against appellant for seven hundred and forty-four dollars ($744.00), and rendered judgment accordingly.

Appellee filed a motion for new trial, which motion was overruled, and thereafter this appeal was perfected. The errors…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. McCaull CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Williams v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KnoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Davis v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rothchild v. Citizens Loan Co. of Indianapolis, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. McElveen v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Moister v. SpickelmierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API