Legal Opinion

Hulan v. Township of Greenfield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteeee, J.

On June 30, 1923, one Mullholland and others petitioned the board of supervisors of Wayne county, pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 279, Pub. Acts 1909 (1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 3309 et seq.), and acts amendatory thereof, for annexation of a certain portion of Greenfield township to the city of Detroit. At a duly called special meeting of .the Wayne county board of supervisors held August 28, 1923, the board took favorable action on the petition and passed a resolution providing that the question of annexation be submitted to the electors of the district to be affected at a special election…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Williams v. CicottMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Adsit v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. Joseph Township v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Kalamazoo Township v. Kalamazoo County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Carnes v. Livingston County Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. County of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  5. Fractional School District No. 1 v. Township School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API