Legal Opinion

MacK v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 2003No. Docket 214448PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: Hood, P.J., and Sawyer and Cavanagh, JJ. Per Curiam.

This case returns to this Court pursuant to the Supreme Court’s remand to reconsider whether the trial court properly granted summary disposition to defendant regarding plaintiff’s claim for sex discrimination based on a violation of the Detroit Charter. Mack v Detroit, 467 Mich 186, 212; 649 NW2d 47 (2002). We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s sexual discrimination claim, but remand to allow for amendment of the complaint.

We shall dispense with a recitation of the facts because those were set forth both in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. MacK v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Beaty v. Hertzberg & Golden, PcMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Driver v. HanleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fisher v. W A Foote Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Fisher v. WA FOOTE MEM. HOSP.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Lexington Insurance Company v. the Alan GroupMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API