Legal Opinion

Cazzanigi v. General Electric Credit Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1997No. Nos. 61947-6; 63417-3PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Plaintiffs claim that financing agreements into which they entered are retail installment contracts which violate the Retail Installment Sales of Goods and Services Act (RISA) under this court’s holdings in Zach-man v. Whirlpool Acceptance Corp., 120 Wn.2d 304, 841 P.2d 27 (1992). Although numerous issues are raised, we find that two issues are dispositive of Plaintiffs’ claims and, accordingly, do not reach the remaining issues. First, we conclude that 1992 legislation deregulating service charges under RISA applies retroactively and disposes of Plaintiffs’ claims that excess service charges…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Johnston v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Seeber v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Bird-Johnson Corp. v. Dana Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cazzanigi v. General Elec. Credit Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ago, Washington Attorney General Reports1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API