Legal Opinion

McInerney v. Valentine

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to annul the action of respondents revoking petitioner’s appointment to the police force of the City of New York *1063and directing that he be restored to his position as patrolman. He duly filed his application, passed the examination, was certified for appointment, was thereafter appointed on February 17, 1943, and thereafter his name was ordered removed from the list for patrolman, and his appointment revoked, effective midnight, June 30, 1943. No question of fraud or bad faith is involved on either side; the equities are with the petitioner…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Wolff v. HodsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In re O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Matter of O'Brien v. Delaney, KernNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. In re KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. Matter of Ottinger v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Perotta v. GregoryNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Faulisi v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hart v. KaplanNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Cyzowski v. PostonNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Feimer v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API