Legal Opinion

Johnson Service Co. v. Hildebrand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, George Hildebrand and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant The Babcock & Wilcox Company, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of April, 1911, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This is an action to foreclose a municipal lien. On the 25th day of June, 1901, the appellant Hildebrand entered into a contract with the city for the erection of a public hath building in the borough' of Brooklyn, pursuant to certain plans and specifications, for the gross sum of §165,480. On the 10th day of February, 1908, he sublet the furnishing of materials and the work required in heating and ventilating the building to the defendant R. J. Sovereign Company, Inc., for the gross sum of §21,000; and on the thirteenth day of the same month the Sovereign Company in turn sublet…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brainard v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Wexler v. RustAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Firth v. RehfeldtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  4. Ringle v. Wallis Iron WorksNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Beecher v. SchubackNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brescia Construction Co. v. Walart Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Audley Clarke Co. v. W. F. Plass & Bro.New York Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API