Department of the Navy v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether this Court should enforce a ruling by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) to the effect that the Department of the Navy (Navy) and the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (Shipyard) committed unfair labor practices in violation of 5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(1) and (8)1 by failing to comply with an arbitration award. We conclude that the FLRA’s order is unenforceable. A detailed discussion of both the factual and legal background is required for a proper understanding of our decision.
Because the principal statute involved, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Federal Labor Relations Authority, in 90-3690 v. U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Ships Parts Control Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Publishing and Printing Service, American Federation of Government Employees, Intervenor. U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Ships Parts Control Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Fleet Material Support Office, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navsea Logistics Center, and U.S. Department of the Navy, Navy Publishing and Printing Service, in 90-3724 v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Department Of The Navy v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987