Legal Opinion

Vetel v. Meiklejohn

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1932No. 2173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, J.

The errors urged in the oral argument and brief of counsel for the defendant are three, which we will consider briefy in the order in which they were presented.

First, “That the court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion to direct a verdict in his favor, made at the conclusion of the introduction of plaintiff’s evidence, and again at the conclusion of all the evidence.”

Second, “That the verdict is manifestly against the weight of the evidence and contrary to law.”

A reading of the record is convincing that no error was committed by the trial court in its action in either of the matters to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WallOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Acker v. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Columbus v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Springfield v. HanlonOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Elgin v. HeatonOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API