Legal Opinion

Springfield v. Hanlon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1939No. 408PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

Defendant, in the Municipal Court of the City of Springfield, was convicted and sentenced for the offense of recklessly and negligently operating his automobile within the city limits. An appeal on questions of law is prosecuted.

The affidavit, insofar as pertinent to the question presented, charges that defendant did operate upon West Main Street, a public street in the City of Springfield, an automobile, and did then and there recklessly and negligently operate at a speed so as to endanger the life, limb and property of a person, contrary to an ordinance of said city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. KinneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Vetel v. MeiklejohnOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Davies v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. O'Malley v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WallOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. City of Toledo v. SoldierOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Columbus v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. State v. JahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  5. State v. BarnettOhio Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API