Legal Opinion

Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 23, 1955No. 5-679PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a suit filed by the appellee to obtain cancellation, for usury, of a conditional sales contract that was executed after the decision became final in Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp., 220 Ark. 601, 249 S. W. 2d 973. The chancellor canceled the contract and quieted the plaintiff’s title to the car that had been sold. It is contended by the appellant that the apparently usurious nature of the agreement was the result of mutual mistake and that even if the contract should be set aside the purchaser is not entitled to keep the automobile.

On July 13,1953, the appellee Stanley bought…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hare v. General Contract Purchase Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. General Contract Corp. v. DukeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Bailey v. Commerce Union BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Universal CIT Credit Corp. v. HudgensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  3. United-Bilt Homes v. KnappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. AverySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  5. Sloan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API