State v. Doria

Appellant Doria was convicted of driving in excess of the legal speed limit, i.e., 72 m.p.h. in a 55 m.p.h. zone, after trial by court and appropriate findings. He appeals that conviction, filing a skeletal brief, pro se, without citations, in which he argues, as best we can ascertain, two issues. The first is a claimed error by the trial court in taking judicial notice of the accuracy of a properly functioning radar unit operated by an experienced operator; the second is a claimed defect in proof that the unit in question had been properly calibrated. On the trial record both issues are…