Legal Opinion

Bullock v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1934No. 24745. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is a negligence action, tried to the court without a jury. At the close of her own case, plaintiff took a voluntary nonsuit as to King county. The trial proceeded against the other defendants, and resulted in findings in their favor. Plaintiff appeals from judgment dismissing the action.

The essential facts, as disclosed by the evidence and found by the trial court, are as follows: Roxbury street runs east and west. Its middle line is the boundary between the city of Seattle and King county. Thirty-fifth avenue southwest runs north and south. For some years, the east eighteen feet of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Swain v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Hunter v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lautenschlager v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Larsen v. City of Sedro-WoolleyWashington Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Acme Paving Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Dupea v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Shuford v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Fritch v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Sharpless v. BlackmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API