Legal Opinion

Teft v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1875PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from Berrien Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Ch. J.

The real grievance alleged by complainant is, that defendants combined to defraud him, and the substance of the transaction, and its incidents, which he relates at much length, may be stated from the bill as follows:

The defendant Stewart resided in St. Joseph, Berrien, county, and owned a stock of goods, including a quantity of boots and shoes. This property was at Bangor, Van Burén county, and was valued by Stewart at some fourteen thousand dollars, and he wished to sell it. One Sherwin, residing in Illinois, owned a tract of about two hundred acres of land in Berrien county,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woollen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. Jones v. NewhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Royer v. State ex rel. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. DickMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Johnson v. SwankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API