Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Village of Skokie

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1998No. 82893PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McMORROW

The “special duty” doctrine was first recognized by this court in Huey v. Town of Cicero, 41 Ill. 2d 361 (1968), as an exception to the common law “public duty” rule. The public duty rule is a long-standing precept which establishes that a governmental entity and its employees owe no duty of care to individual members of the general public to provide governmental services, such as police and fire protection. Huey, 41 Ill. 2d at 363. This rule of nonliability is grounded in the principle that the duty of the governmental entity to “preserve the well-being of the community is owed to the public…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  3. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. PerryIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Van Meter v. Darien Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Valentino v. Village of South Chicago HeightsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Wakulich v. MrazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API