Legal Opinion

United States v. Bullington

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 26, 1981No. SPCM 15952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF1

JONES, Senior Judge:

The appellant asks this Court to enforce the limitation on convening authority action *571specified in the decretal paragraph of our opinion of 7 July 1981, reflecting our initial decision in this case. In the decretal paragraph of that opinion, this Court conditionally set aside the sentence and authorized a rehearing or, in the alternative, if such a rehearing was impracticable, reassessment of the sentence and approval of one that did not include a bad-conduct discharge.2

The convening authority determined a rehearing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. MillsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. Barnett v. PersonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. BullingtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. Hollywood v. YostU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. FortneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API