Seaney v. Ayres
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKelley, J.
— The question submitted by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer of the appellees, Matilda B. Ayres, George E. Goodwin, and Summit Gas & Water Company, Inc., to appellant’s fourth amended complaint on the grounds that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that there is a defect of parties.
The complaint, in material and pertinent part, as exhibited in appellant’s brief, alleges in substance:
That the decedent, the appellee, Matilda B. Ayres, and the appellees other than George E. Goodwin and Summit Gas & Water…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeillIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Budd v. Bd. of Co. Comrs. of St. Joseph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Ebbeskotte v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
- WALKER v. EllisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Loper v. STANDARD OIL COMPANYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965