Legal Opinion

Seaney v. Ayres

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1963No. 19,663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKelley, J.

— The question submitted by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer of the appellees, Matilda B. Ayres, George E. Goodwin, and Summit Gas & Water Company, Inc., to appellant’s fourth amended complaint on the grounds that said complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that there is a defect of parties.

The complaint, in material and pertinent part, as exhibited in appellant’s brief, alleges in substance:

That the decedent, the appellee, Matilda B. Ayres, and the appellees other than George E. Goodwin and Summit Gas & Water…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Rochester Bridge Co. v. McNeillIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Budd v. Bd. of Co. Comrs. of St. Joseph Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ebbeskotte v. TylerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. WALKER v. EllisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Loper v. STANDARD OIL COMPANYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API