Legal Opinion

Van Der Salm Bulb Farms, Inc. v. Hapag Lloyd, Ag

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1987No. 86-3835PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

818 F.2d 699

1988 A.M.C. 1216

VAN DER SALM BULB FARMS, INC., a Washington Corporation;

Royal Insurance Company of America, a corporation,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

HAPAG LLOYD, AG; Compagnie General Maritime, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 86-3835.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 8, 1987.

Decided June 3, 1987.

James D. Mullins, Vancouver, Wash., Mildred J. Carmack, Portland, Or., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Kim Jefferies, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before ANDERSON, TANG and NOONAN,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Debbie Fiester, an Individual v. Allan TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Emmco Insurance Company v. Wallenius Caribbean Line, S.A., Defendant-Third Party v. Gulfstream Shipping Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  4. F. J. McCarty Co., Inc. v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. All Pacific Trading, Inc. v. Vessel M/V Hanjin YosuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance v. Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API