Legal Opinion

Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance v. Nippon Express U.S.A., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2002No. 00-57212; D.C. No. CV-99-11981-CASPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company (“Tokio Marine”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment limiting Tokio Marine’s relief to $16,500 under Section 4(5) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”).1 Tokio Marine argues that the district court erred when it determined that the 33 skids listed on the K-Line bill of lading were COGSA packages rather than the 177 pieces also found on the bill of lading. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we review de novo the district court’s definition of “package” under COGSA. Van der Salm Bulb Farms Inc. v. Hapag…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. The Vessel Sam Houston, and Waterman Steamship CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Van Der Salm Bulb Farms, Inc. v. Hapag Lloyd, AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. C. White Marine, Inc. v. S&R Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API