Legal Opinion

Clark v. Titus

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1886No. Civil No. 145PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This was a suit to recover six lots in the city of Tombstone, Cochise county. The case was tried by the court without a jury. The case comes up on the findings of the court below, and it is not necessary to look carefully into the evidence. Errors were assigned upon the admission of evidence, but, in the view we take of the case, it is not necessary to consider them.

The findings are that on March 20, 1880, the corporate authorities of the town of Tombstone, made application for a patent for lands for a town-site, as is provided in section 2387, Rev. St. TJ. S. On September 20, 1880, a patent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winfield Town Co. v. MarisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. Castner v. GuntherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
  3. In re SelbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Leech v. RauchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Boise City v. WilkinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Mayor of Aspen v. Aspen Town & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. City of Guthrie v. BeamerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Martin v. HoffArizona Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Capener v. Tanadgusix Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API