Leech v. Rauch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The issues joined by tbe pleadings in this cause, are stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court. Tbe case was tried in Steele County, upon a change of venue from Blue Eartb County; and a verdict rendered in favor of tbe Respondent, Defendant below.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Qov/rt
— Atwater, J.
This was an action brought by the Appellant in tbe District Court for tbe Sixth Judicial District, to recover lot number ten, in block twenty-seven, in tbe town of Mankato. Tbe Complaint alleges that on tbe 14th of February, 1853, tbe Plaintiff, in conjunction with other parties therein named, selected lands in which lot ten, block twenty-seven, are embraced, being 318 88-100th acres, on tbe town site of Mankato; that at tbe time stated the Company took possession of, and made settlement on tbe lands under tbe municipal pre-emption law of 1844, and by themselves and…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Winfield Town Co. v. MarisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Coy v. CoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Bingham v. City of Walla Walla, Washington Territory1887
- Lockwitz v. LarsonUtah Supreme Court · 1898
- Clark v. TitusArizona Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.