Legal Opinion

People v. Bynon

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1956No. Crim. 5670PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

The defendant was charged by an information with violating the provisions of section 288, Penal Code (crimes against children, lewd and lascivious acts), and section 285 of the Penal Code (incest). The trial was commenced with a jury on October 21, 1955, and prior to the swearing of any witness, and outside the hearing and presence of the jury, upon the motion of the district attorney, the count having to do with incest was dismissed. It was apparently established by certain birth certificates and adoption papers produced by the defendant that the child in question was not the natural…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Commonwealth v. StattiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. State v. DammSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Hayt v. Brewster, Gordon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. TaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Bowen v. EymanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1970
  4. Knapp v. HardyArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. LawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API