Legal Opinion

Hartung v. Ten Broeck Tyre Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 11, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Fourth Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Plaintiff, Leonard Hartung, who was injured while in the employ of the Ten Broeck Tyre Company, brought this suit against the company to recover damages. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The only question involved’ is whether there was sufficient evidence of negligence to take the case to the jury.

The accident happened under the following circumstances: Plaintiff had been in defendant’s employ for several months. For about four months next preceding the accident he had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huddleston's Admr. v. Straight Creek Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Lile v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Shinn Glove Co. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Thomas v. National Concrete Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashland Supply Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Big Sandy Cumberland Railroad v. Measell's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Green v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API