Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

In this action by the appellee to recover damages for personal injuries sustained, as alleged, by the negligence of the appellant railroad company, there was a judgment in his favor for four thousand dollars, followed by this appeal.

A somewhat extended statement of the facts is made necessary on account of the grounds relied on for reversal, and so we will set them out before taking up the reasons assigned by counsel for the railroad company why a new trial should be ordered.

The appellee, Smith, was employed by the railroad company as a telegraph…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. KoenneckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Kansas City Western Railway Co. v. McAdowSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  2. Louisville & Nashville Rd. v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Allen's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  4. Newberry v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  5. Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API