Hawley v. Bonanza Queen Mining Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered April 2, 1910, abating an action against a corporation upon suggestion that it had been dissolved.
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.
This action was instituted against the Bonanza Queen Mining Company and others, to foreclose certain liens for labor performed in and about the company’s mines. The defendants, other than the mining company, were not served with process and made no appearance in the action. The mining company answered to the merits, but when the case was called for trial its counsel suggested to the court that since the commencement of the action the company’s name had been stricken from the records of the office of the secretary of state, pursuant to chapter 140, of the Laws of 1907, page 270 (Rem. & Bal.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Citizen's Club v. Welling, Secy. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Dalton Adding MacHine Sales Co. v. LindquistWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Holmes v. JewettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.