Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Litchfield

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 9, 1886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Boone Circiát Court. Action to enforce a mecbanic’s lien. There was a decree for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Oh. J".

The plaintiff averred in his petition that in September, 1880, by virtue of a contract with the defendant’s testate, he performed labor upon and furnished material for certain buildings, on certain land belonging to the defendant’s testate, E. 0. Litchfield, and that there is due him therefor the sum of $174.69. E. 0. Litchfield answered, denying the alleged contract. Afterwards he died, and the defendant, E. II. Litchfield, was substituted as his executor.

*466The fact appeal’s to be that the plaintiff performed labor upon and furnished materials for certain buildings upon E. 0.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Galveston Exhibition Association v. PerkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Queal Lumber Co. v. LipmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Hoag & Griffith v. HaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Royal Lumber Co. v. HoelznerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. Sheldon v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API