Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Hyde Park Co. v. Planning Commission

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1998No. 18602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

{1} Petitioner Hyde Park Company (Developer) appeals the district court’s order dissolving a peremptory writ of mandamus and alias peremptory writ of mandamus. We hold that Developer did not exhaust the administrative remedies available to it and therefore dismiss the appeal.

{2} We note that Developer filed a motion to modify the record proper in this case to include a stipulation of facts. An objection to that motion has also been filed. Certain letters containing various contentions of the parties concerning Developer’s pending appeal in district court have also been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Castaneda v. Illinois Human Rights CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Birdo v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Rhein v. ADT Automotive, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Baca v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Alfred v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Hart v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Hart v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. Rancho del Oso Pardo, Inc. v. New Mexico Department of Game and FishDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API