Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo & Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 27, 2010No. Case 09-CV-2764 PJS AJBPublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wells Fargo & Company (“Wells Fargo”) brings this action for a refund of taxes and previously paid deficiency interest. In its amended answer to Wells Fargo’s amended complaint, the government has asserted an “offset” or “recoupment” defense. 1 See Docket No. 36 at 41. Wells Fargo brought a motion to strike this defense under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), which was denied by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan in an order dated July 15, 2010, 2010 WL 2814317. Docket No. 51.
This matter is before the Court on Wells Fargo’s objection to Judge…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hamilton v. PalmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Coons v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Smith v. Bradley Pizza, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Odyssey Imaging, LLC v. Cardiology Associates of Johnston, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2010
- Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. Productos Lacteos Tocumbo S.A. De C.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Subramanian v. Tata Consultancy Servs. Ltd.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.