Legal Opinion

Prudential Commercial Insurance v. Michigan Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1991No. S91Q0727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Presiding Justice.

These questions are before us on certification from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The appellant, Prudential Commercial Insurance Company (Prudential), as statutory subrogee of Charlotte, Allen, and Daniel Kimerling (Prudential’s insureds) sued the appellee, Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (Michigan Mutual), to recover personal injury protection (PIP) benefits paid to the Kimerlings. The Kimerlings had been injured in a collision with a tractor-trailer insured by Michigan Mutual. Judge Robert Hall of the United States District Court for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Five Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Vigilant Insurance v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Southern General Insurance Company v. Cotton States Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Jordan v. T G & Y Stores Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prudential Commercial Insurance Company v. Michigan Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Prudential Commercial Insurance ex rel. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Ass'n v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. PRUDENTIAL COM. INS. CO. v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API