Legal Opinion

State v. Wade

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1991No. 17102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Presiding Judge.

Following jury trial defendant was convicted of forgery and sentenced to seventy-five days in the county jail. Defendant appeals, presenting two points relied on.

For his first point, defendant asserts that there was insufficient evidence to support the charge as there was no evidence defendant had an “intent to defraud”.

“[Pjurpose to defraud” is an essential element of forgery. § 570.090.1, RSMo 1986. In reviewing to see whether there was evidence of such purpose, this court accepts as true all direct and circumstantial evidence and all reasonable inferences which are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  2. State v. GeorgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. HarrounSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. State v. RichardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. State v. HogshooterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WoodworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. MooreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State of Missouri v. Robert T. ByingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. CockrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API