Legal Opinion

Kalas v. Fay

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1923No. 14778PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

1. The assignments of error in the bill of exceptions based upon the admission in evidence of a retention-of-title contract, and of certain promissory notes which represented the balance due on the purchase-price of the property to which the. plaintiff retained title, cannot be considered, since the documents or their contents are not disclosed, either by the assignments of error themselves or by any recitals in the petition for certiorari. A petition for certiorari alleging error must show error; and where the assignments of error therein are insufficient to accomplish this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moultrie Repair Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Smith v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Jones v. SniderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Guilford, Wood & Co. v. McKinleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  5. Pearson v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PACIFIC NATIONAL FIRE &C. CO. v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Dasher v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. C. I. T. Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Standard Motors Finance Co. v. O'NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Kirkland v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API