Commonwealth v. Retkofsky

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 After a bench trial, appellant David Retkofsky was convicted of endangering the welfare of a child and fleeing from a police officer. 1 He was sentenced to twelve months probation. Appellant’s timely appeal presents only one issue: Did the Commonwealth present sufficient evidence for appellant to be found guilty of the crime of endangering the welfare of a child? We affirm.

¶ 2 In reviewing a sufficiency claim, we must view all the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as the verdict winner to determine if the fact-finder could have found each element…