Legal Opinion

(PS) Amin v. Momand

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 7, 2025No. 2:24-cv-03557Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NAJIBULLA AMIN, No. 2:24-cv-03557-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DAMAN MOMAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to 19 Dismiss (ECF No. 26), which seeks to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) for lack of 20 subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff failed to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API