Legal Opinion

Lunn v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from Red River. Tried below before the Hon. James Q. Chenoweth.

1Opinion of the Court

Reeves, Associate Justice.

The indictment in this case charges the defendant, George Lunn, with theft of four hogs • of the value of five dollars each. The jury found the defendant guilty, and assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for one year. There was a motion in arrest of judgment and' motion for a new trial, which motions being overruled, the defendant appealed.

The grounds of the motion in arrest of judgment are: 1. Because the indictment does not charge any offense against the laws of the State. 2. The indictment is vague, uncertain, and defective. 3. The indictment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JennesMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. People v. HopsonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. People v. CostelloCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  4. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Drake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Crosslin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Jamison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Batchelor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API