Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Windham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 17, 1952No. 34086, 34110PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiffs in error do not contend that the claimant was not injured as found by the single director and affirmed by the Superior Court of Muscogee County. The sole contention is that the claimant was not shown to be an employee of the Co-op Cab Company as defined in § 2 (b) of the act of 1920 (Ga. L. 1920, p. 167) as amended by the acts of 1943 (Ga. L. 1943, pp. 401, 402) and 1950 (Ga. L. 1950, pp. 324, 405); Code, Ann. Supp., § 114-101: “‘Employee’ shall include every person in the service of another under any contract of hire or apprenticeship,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shannon v. Western Indemnity Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Matter of Glielmi v. Netherland Dairy Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. KentTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Liberty Lumber Co. v. SilasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. WindhamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Marvin A. Ball v. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Brewer v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WindhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.