Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Blackstone Coal & Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 1913No. 4123PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. C. Allen, Judge. Action between T. A. Barnett, guardian, and others and the Blaekstone Coal & Milling Company. From the judgment, Barnett and others bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Section 16, art. J (section 201, Williams’ Ann. Const. Okla.), of the Constitution of this state is as follows:

“Until otherwise provided by' law, in all cases' arising under the probate jurisdiction of the county court, appeals may be taken from the judgments of the county court to the district court of the county in the same manner as is now provided by the laws of the territory of Oklahoma for appeals from the probate- court to the district court, and in all cases appealed from the county court to the district court, the cause shall be tried de novo in the district court upon questions of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. In Re Copperfield's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Gray v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. In Re TheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Smith v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API