Legal Opinion

Gray v. McKnight

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1915No. 4426PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from County Court, Caddo County; C. Ross Hume, Judge. ' Action by Mary B. Gray (revived in the name of Sarah B. Gray, James E. Boys, and John H.. Boys) against L. K„ McKnight, F. H. Haskett, Robert L. Boke, and Albert Lamar, to vacate order of distribution of estate in the matter of the estate of John W. Nestell, deceased. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKEE, C.

Plaintiff in error appeals from an order of the county court of Caddo county, denying a petition duly verified and filed on August 30, 1911. under sections 4464, 4466-4472, Stat. 1893 (sections 5267, • 5269-5275, Eev. Laws 1910), to vacate a decree of distribution of an estate made on June 6 and 7, 1910, in the •exercise of the probate jurisdiction of said court in the case of the matter of the estate of • John W. Nestell, •deceased.

The defendant in error moves this court to dismiss this appeal' on the alleged ground that this is a case “arising under the probate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Welch v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Brigman v. CheneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Barnett v. Blackstone Coal & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Lucas v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. HodgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Ray Ex Rel. Ray v. WoodardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API