Legal Opinion

In re Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 31, 2002No. 85,487PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

On March 9, 2001, respondent W. Fredrick Zimmerman was disciplined by suspension for 1 year and ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings and to furnish proof of compliance with Supreme Court Rule 218 (2002 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 279). It was made a condition of his reinstatement to provide proof of current malpractice insurance. See In re Zimmerman, 270 Kan. 855, 19 P.3d 160 (2001).

On November 26, 2002, respondent filed an affidavit verifying that he has fully complied with the conditions entered by this court on March 9, 2001, and moves the court for an order reinstating him to the practice…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re ZimmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gilkey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API